Search

What are you looking for?

12 results for qwen

AI·LLM-as-judge scores fluctuate across evaluators even with fixed candidate responses, treating the issue as measurement validity. Across four datasets, scaling Qwen3 from 1.7B to 32B parameters yields only limited adjacent gains, while MiniMax M2-to-M2.7 API upgrades show none; stronger judges reduce but do not eliminate position and verbosity biases, with repeated juries offering little benefit under correlated errors.

arXiv cs.CL·arxiv.org··1.9Researchllm-as-judgeevaluation-reliabilitybias

AI·Researchers developed SQZ-Qwen-ASR-1.7B for MLC-SLM 2026 Task 1, combining a modular speaker diarization front-end (VAD, CAMPPlus embeddings, spectral clustering, RTTM segmentation) with Qwen3-ASR-1.7B adapted via full supervised fine-tuning, LoRA on TTS-generated synthetic speech, and GRPO reinforcement learning for lower tcpMER (23.70 on dev set, 17.97 on eval set).